Everitt v. De Groff
This text of 1 Cow. 213 (Everitt v. De Groff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue is sufficiently joined. “ &c.” at the close of the plea, shall he construed in this case to mean evcry necessary matter that ought to be expressed; and so are several authorities. (Co. Litt. 17 b. Per Ld. Mansfield & Aston, J. in Sayer v. Boyer, Cowp. 407.) We, accordingly, construe it to mean a similiter.
Motion denied.
Vid. Harris’ case, Cro. Jac. 502, and Berton v. Mandell, id. 67, 3 Burr. 1793, Statute of amendments and jeofails, 1 R. L. 118-19, that the J ustices shall proceed to give judgment upon a verdict, notwithstanding: a misjoining of the issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cow. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everitt-v-de-groff-nysupct-1823.