Everhome Mortgage Company v. Nuchem Aber

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2022·No. 85·Published

Opinion

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 85 Everhome Mortgage Company, Appellant,

v.

Nuchem Aber et al., Respondents,

et al., Defendants.

Mikelle V. Bliss, for appellant. Anthony R. Filosa, for respondents.

MEMORANDUM:

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed, with costs.

In this foreclosure action, defendant Equity Recovery Corporation (Equity)

established that the statute of limitations began to run on April 30, 2009, when plaintiff commenced the first action to foreclose the mortgage (see Albertina Realty Co. v Rosbro

-2- No. 85 Realty Corp., 258 NY 472, 476 [1932]; Freedom Mortgage Corp. v Engel, 37 NY3d 1, 22- 23 [2021]). That first action was dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff’s failure to appear for a court conference. Plaintiff did not commence this second foreclosure action until June 24, 2015, more than six years after acceleration of the debt (see CPLR 213 [4]). We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition to Equity’s motion for, among other things, dismissal of the amended complaint as time-barred and for summary judgment on its counterclaim pursuant to RPAPL article 15 (195 AD3d 682, 689 [2d Dept 2021]).

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Acting Chief Judge Cannataro and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Troutman concur.

Decided November 17, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everhome Mortgage Company v. Nuchem Aber, (N.Y. 2022).

Everhome Mortgage Company v. Nuchem Aber (Everhome Mortgage Company v. Nuchem Aber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albertina Realty Co. v. Rosbro Realty Corp.
180 N.E. 176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)