Everhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
575 F. App'x 100
This text of 575 F. App'x 100 (Everhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Everhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 575 F. App'x 100 (4th Cir. 2014).
Opinion
Carol Everhart appeals the magistrate judge’s order of judgment for the Defendant in accordance with the jury’s verdict in her civil action.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
575 F. App'x 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everhart-v-washington-metropolitan-area-transit-authority-ca4-2014.