Everhart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Everhart v. State

398 So. 2d 997, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19878

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 20, 1981

DocketNo. 81-662

StatusPublished

This text of 398 So. 2d 997 (Everhart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everhart v. State, 398 So. 2d 997, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19878 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s contention that his sentence has been illegally enhanced is disposed of by the holding in Blanton v. State, 388 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) which decided the issue adversely to appellant’s position. We nevertheless remand for resentencing in light of Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. Case No. 1981).

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s contention that his sentence has been illegally enhanced is disposed of by the holding in Blanton v. State, 388 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) which decided the issue adversely to appellant’s position. We nevertheless remand for resentencing in light of Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. Case No. 1981).

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

398 So. 2d 997, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everhart-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack