Everett v. Wilkerson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 2005
Docket04-7933
StatusUnpublished

This text of Everett v. Wilkerson (Everett v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everett v. Wilkerson, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7933

LONNIE EVERETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TROOPER WILKERSON; TROOPER BRANCH; I. GRAHAM PRUITT, Magistrate at Pitt County Detention Center; STACEY A. PHIPPS, Associate Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-569-5-4)

Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie Everett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lonnie Everett appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as time-barred his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Everett v. Wilkerson, No. CA-04-569-5-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Everett v. Wilkerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-wilkerson-ca4-2005.