Everett v. Wilkerson
This text of Everett v. Wilkerson (Everett v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7933
LONNIE EVERETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TROOPER WILKERSON; TROOPER BRANCH; I. GRAHAM PRUITT, Magistrate at Pitt County Detention Center; STACEY A. PHIPPS, Associate Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-569-5-4)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lonnie Everett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lonnie Everett appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as time-barred his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2000). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Everett v. Wilkerson, No. CA-04-569-5-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Everett v. Wilkerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-wilkerson-ca4-2005.