Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Everett v. State

Everett v. State

208 So. 3d 833, 2017 WL 362518, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 739
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 2017
DocketNo. 3D15-1219
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 So. 3d 833 (Everett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everett v. State, 208 So. 3d 833, 2017 WL 362518, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 739 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1232 (Fla. 1990) (“Lay witness opinion is admissible if it is within the ken of an intelligent person with a degree of experience. ... We find the officers’ testimony within the permissible range of lay observation and ordinary police experience.”)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
238 So. 3d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 3d 833, 2017 WL 362518, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.