Everett v. State

208 So. 3d 833, 2017 WL 362518, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 739
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2017·No. No. 3D15-1219·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1232 (Fla. 1990) (“Lay witness opinion is admissible if it is within the ken of an intelligent person with a degree of experience. ... We find the officers’ testimony within the permissible range of lay observation and ordinary police experience.”)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everett v. State, 208 So. 3d 833, 2017 WL 362518, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 739 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

208 So. 3d 833 (Everett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. State
238 So. 3d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)