Everett v. State

671 So. 2d 892, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3922, 1996 WL 185665
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3096
StatusPublished

This text of 671 So. 2d 892 (Everett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everett v. State, 671 So. 2d 892, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3922, 1996 WL 185665 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we remand the ease for the court to correct minor sentencing errors. Appellant was sentenced in Case Nos. 95-912 and 95-915. In Case No. 95-912, the court placed appellant on probation for possession of cocaine and sentenced him to time served for possession of cannabis. However, the written probation order includes both offenses. Furthermore, one of [893]*893the special conditions in the probation order for Case No. 95-912 specifies that appellant is to serve a year in county jail, but fails to provide credit for time served of 148 days, which was the amount noted by the court at sentencing. These errors must be corrected on remand.

In Case No. 95-915, appellant was placed on probation for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine. The probation orders in Case Nos. 95-912 and 95-915 are form orders which include standard community control and sex offender conditions. Because these conditions are inapplicable, they must be stricken. In all other respects, the sentencing disposition is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED with instructions.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 So. 2d 892, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3922, 1996 WL 185665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.