Everett v. State

491 So. 2d 1311, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1715, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9249
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1986·No. No. 85-2640·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from summary denial of a motion made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. There are a number of allegations which have not been refuted by any part of the record provided us on appeal and which, if proven to be true, may well constitute ineffective assist-anee of counsel. Specifically, petitioner’s allegations numbered one, five, six, eleven, sixteen, nineteen and twenty have not been adequately refuted by the portions of the record provided on appeal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everett v. State, 491 So. 2d 1311, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1715, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

491 So. 2d 1311 (Everett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. Kencher, Inc.
491 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)