Everett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Everett v. State

106 So. 680, 21 Ala. App. 195, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 329

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 15, 1925

Docket4 Div. 171.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 680 (Everett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everett v. State, 106 So. 680, 21 Ala. App. 195, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 329 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by having in his possession a quantity of beer containing alcohol. Everything connected with his trial was regular and without error. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict returned.

Charge 2, requested, by defendant, was properly refused. The purpose for which the mixture was placed in the barrel would not affect appellant’s guilt vel non of the offense charged.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by having in his possession a quantity of beer containing alcohol. Everything connected with his trial was regular and without error. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict returned.

Charge 2, requested, by defendant, was properly refused. The purpose for which the mixture was placed in the barrel would not affect appellant’s guilt vel non of the offense charged.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 680, 21 Ala. App. 195, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-state-alactapp-1925.