Everett v. . Salsbury

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Everett v. . Salsbury

198 S.E. 663, 214 N.C. 819, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 418

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 28, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 S.E. 663 (Everett v. . Salsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everett v. . Salsbury, 198 S.E. 663, 214 N.C. 819, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendants made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below refused the motions and in this we can see no error. The charge of the court below is not in the record and the presumption is that the court below charged the law applicable to the facts. The jury decided the facts for plaintiff. We see no error in the record.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendants made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below refused the motions and in this we can see no error. The charge of the court below is not in the record and the presumption is that the court below charged the law applicable to the facts. The jury decided the facts for plaintiff. We see no error in the record.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 S.E. 663, 214 N.C. 819, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-salsbury-nc-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack