Everett v. Peyton

65 N.Y.S. 1132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Everett v. Peyton. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 A.D. 90

Opinion

• PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that a question of law is involved in this case which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals. It is not entirely clear that this case belongs to the class of judgment creditors’ actions in which any leave from this court is required by the statute; but, in order to remove all doubt on the subject, we have concluded to grant the desired order. We do not think that the proper practice requires the certification of any specific questions. See 62 N. Y. Supp. 910.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everett v. Peyton, 65 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

65 N.Y.S. 1132 (Everett v. Peyton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Everett v. Peyton
62 N.Y.S. 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)