Everett v. Haulenbeek

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Everett v. Haulenbeek

77 F. 12, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 77 F. 12 (Everett v. Haulenbeek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everett v. Haulenbeek, 77 F. 12, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936 (circtsdny 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The master’s fees are hereby taxed at $500. Since he has been paid $175, it only remains for the court to indicate who shall pay the balance of his compensation, $325. The defendant II., by contesting complainant’s claim, made it necessary to call upon the master to render these services; and, since he is the defeated party, he should pay them. An older directing such payment will be made. Any question as to defendant’s pecuniary condi tion may be considered upon any future motion to enforce such order. They are not properly raised upon this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The master’s fees are hereby taxed at $500. Since he has been paid $175, it only remains for the court to indicate who shall pay the balance of his compensation, $325. The defendant II., by contesting complainant’s claim, made it necessary to call upon the master to render these services; and, since he is the defeated party, he should pay them. An older directing such payment will be made. Any question as to defendant’s pecuniary condi tion may be considered upon any future motion to enforce such order. They are not properly raised upon this motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 F. 12, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-haulenbeek-circtsdny-1896.