Everett v. Everett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Everett v. Everett

422 So. 2d 20, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20715

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 4, 1982

DocketNo. 82-75

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 20 (Everett v. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everett v. Everett, 422 So. 2d 20, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife makes a wide-ranging argument that she was financially shortchanged in the dissolution judgment. From our review of the record, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion. In order to obviate the possibility of a later dispute, we hereby construe the provision which gives the wife sole possession of the marital home for a year but requires her to be solely responsible for the mortgage and insurance to mean that she will be entitled to credit for one half of these payments upon the sale of the home now owned as tenants in common by reason of the dissolution. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DGA 1979). As construed, the judgment is affirmed.

OTT, C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The wife makes a wide-ranging argument that she was financially shortchanged in the dissolution judgment. From our review of the record, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion. In order to obviate the possibility of a later dispute, we hereby construe the provision which gives the wife sole possession of the marital home for a year but requires her to be solely responsible for the mortgage and insurance to mean that she will be entitled to credit for one half of these payments upon the sale of the home now owned as tenants in common by reason of the dissolution. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DGA 1979). As construed, the judgment is affirmed.

OTT, C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 So. 2d 20, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-everett-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack