Everett v. Crossroads Ford

Fourth Circuit

Everett v. Crossroads Ford

132 F. App'x 441

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2005·No. No. 04-2574·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John H. Everett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Everett v. Crossroads Ford, No. CA-04-805BR-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John H. Everett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Everett v. Crossroads Ford, No. CA-04-805BR-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Everett v. Crossroads Ford, 132 F. App'x 441 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

132 F. App'x 441 (Everett v. Crossroads Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related