Everett H. Bickley and Mary B. Bickley, a Copartnership, Trading as Bickley Manufacturing Co. v. Frutchey Bean Company
279 F.2d 685, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 422, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4871
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1960·No. 13989_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Picard, reported in Bickley v. Frutchey Bean Company, 173 F.Supp. 516.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Everett H. Bickley and Mary B. Bickley, a Copartnership, Trading as Bickley Manufacturing Co. v. Frutchey Bean Company, 279 F.2d 685, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 422, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4871 (6th Cir. 1960).
279 F.2d 685 (Everett H. Bickley and Mary B. Bickley, a Copartnership, Trading as Bickley Manufacturing Co. v. Frutchey Bean Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc.
1995 Ohio 201 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
McAuliffe v. Western States Import Co.
651 N.E.2d 957 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Structural Dynamics Research Corp. v. Engineering Mechanics Research Corp.
401 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. Michigan, 1975)
Sparton Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Evans Products Co., and Cross-Appellant. (Two Cases)
293 F.2d 699 (Sixth Circuit, 1961)