Everett Graves v. Florida Probation and Parole Commission, State of Florida

456 F.2d 1300, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10521
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 1972
Docket71-3174
StatusPublished

This text of 456 F.2d 1300 (Everett Graves v. Florida Probation and Parole Commission, State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everett Graves v. Florida Probation and Parole Commission, State of Florida, 456 F.2d 1300, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10521 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Everett Graves, an inmate of the Florida State Penitentiary at Raiford, filed a Federal civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, seeking injunc-tive relief against the Florida Probation and Parole Commission. He alleged in effect that the agency operated in an unconstitutionally discriminatory manner by denying parole opportunities to otherwise eligible candidates solely because of their race, religion, nationality and sex. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the theory that Graves lacked standing to sue, since he had not alleged that his own rights were jeopardized by the Commission’s allegedly unlawful action. In his motion for rehearing the petitioner did assert that his personal parole status was adversely affected, but without explicitly considering this claim or assigning written reasons for its action the District Court denied the motion.

Contrary to the rationale underlying the order of dismissal, Graves *1301 clearly had standing to sue once he had amended his complaint to allege that he was the victim of a policy of racial discrimination allegedly adopted by the defendant. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp, 1970, 397 U.S. 150, 90 S.Ct. 827, 25 L. Ed.2d 184; Barlow v. Collins, 1970, 397 U.S. 159, 90 S.Ct. 832, 25 L.Ed.2d 192. For that reason we vacate the District Court’s order and remand for further consideration of the allegations raised in this complaint. Obviously we intimate no determination of the merits, if any.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barlow v. Collins
397 U.S. 159 (Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 F.2d 1300, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-graves-v-florida-probation-and-parole-commission-state-of-florida-ca5-1972.