Eveready Insurance v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eveready Insurance v. Thompson

301 A.D.2d 650, 753 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 301 A.D.2d 650 (Eveready Insurance v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eveready Insurance v. Thompson, 301 A.D.2d 650, 753 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated June 24, 2002, which dismissed its motion to include an additional issue for determination at a hearing upon the ground that the motion had been rendered academic by a stipulation discontinuing the petition against the proposed additional respondent Allstate Insurance Company.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner’s motion on the merits.

After the Supreme Court ordered a hearing to determine whether Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) insured the offending vehicle on the date of the accident, the petitioner moved to include a second issue for determination at the hearing. The parties then entered into a stipulation which discontinued the petition “as to Allstate only,” but expressly provided that the issue raised by the pending motion, which involved a dispute over whether the petitioner’s insured and her passengers had given timely notice of their uninsured motorist claim, was “still before the court.” Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court erred in concluding, in essence, that the stipulation discontinuing the action against Allstate rendered the pending motion academic. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner’s motion on the merits. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated June 24, 2002, which dismissed its motion to include an additional issue for determination at a hearing upon the ground that the motion had been rendered academic by a stipulation discontinuing the petition against the proposed additional respondent Allstate Insurance Company.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner’s motion on the merits.

After the Supreme Court ordered a hearing to determine whether Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) insured the offending vehicle on the date of the accident, the petitioner moved to include a second issue for determination at the hearing. The parties then entered into a stipulation which discontinued the petition “as to Allstate only,” but expressly provided that the issue raised by the pending motion, which involved a dispute over whether the petitioner’s insured and her passengers had given timely notice of their uninsured motorist claim, was “still before the court.” Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court erred in concluding, in essence, that the stipulation discontinuing the action against Allstate rendered the pending motion academic. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner’s motion on the merits. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 650, 753 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eveready-insurance-v-thompson-nyappdiv-2003.