Eveready Insurance v. Royal Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eveready Insurance v. Royal Insurance

215 A.D.2d 557, 626 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5064

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to confirm an arbitration award, Royal Insurance Company appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated January 13, 1994, which confirmed the arbitrator’s award and is in favor of the petitioner and against it in the principal sum of $59,408.58.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Prior to arbitration, the appellant’s attorney affirmatively represented that "the proper forum for resolving the medical issues between the no fault carrier and the compensation carrier would be inter-company arbitration”. Thereafter, the appellant fully participated in arbitration without ever seeking a stay of arbitration. Under these circumstances, we find that the appellant has waived its present claim that the arbitrators lacked the authority to decide this controversy (see, Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 383; Matter of Smullyan [Sibjet S.A.], 201 AD2d 335).

[558] We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to confirm an arbitration award, Royal Insurance Company appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated January 13, 1994, which confirmed the arbitrator’s award and is in favor of the petitioner and against it in the principal sum of $59,408.58.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Prior to arbitration, the appellant’s attorney affirmatively represented that "the proper forum for resolving the medical issues between the no fault carrier and the compensation carrier would be inter-company arbitration”. Thereafter, the appellant fully participated in arbitration without ever seeking a stay of arbitration. Under these circumstances, we find that the appellant has waived its present claim that the arbitrators lacked the authority to decide this controversy (see, Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 383; Matter of Smullyan [Sibjet S.A.], 201 AD2d 335).

[558] We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Eveready Insurance v. Royal Insurance, 215 A.D.2d 557, 626 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

215 A.D.2d 557 (Eveready Insurance v. Royal Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related