Eveready Insurance v. Alokozai

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eveready Insurance v. Alokozai

204 A.D.2d 267, 614 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4560

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 267 (Eveready Insurance v. Alokozai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eveready Insurance v. Alokozai, 204 A.D.2d 267, 614 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties under an insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated September 18, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents Thomas and Rose Scopelliti.

We find that there are issues of fact as to whether the July 23, 1990 letter constituted sufficient notice of the accident and whether the delay in notifying the plaintiff insurance company was reasonable under the circumstances (see, James v Allstate Ins. Co., 177 AD2d 998). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties under an insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated September 18, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents Thomas and Rose Scopelliti.

We find that there are issues of fact as to whether the July 23, 1990 letter constituted sufficient notice of the accident and whether the delay in notifying the plaintiff insurance company was reasonable under the circumstances (see, James v Allstate Ins. Co., 177 AD2d 998). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 267, 614 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eveready-insurance-v-alokozai-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack