Everdyke v. Esley
This text of 258 A.D. 843 (Everdyke v. Esley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appeEants to abide the event. Memorandum: The court erred in not permitting proof of the conviction of the plaintiff. (Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co., 258 N. Y. 310; Matter of Rechtschaffen, 278 id. 336.) AE concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a civE action for assault. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 843, 15 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everdyke-v-esley-nyappdiv-1939.