Everdell v. Brooklyn Savings Bank
This text of 262 A.D. 758 (Everdell v. Brooklyn Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the appellant’s application for an order of interpleader reversed on the facts, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs; the funds to remain on deposit in the appellant bank to the credit of the action until final judgment. Under all the facts and circumstances the application should have been granted. Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 758, 28 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everdell-v-brooklyn-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1941.