Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 904, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1504

United States Customs Court·Decided May 11, 1966·No. No. P66/53; protests 58/8624,etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in [905]*905all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in [905]*905all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 904, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1504 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

56 Cust. Ct. 904 (Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related