Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 116
United States Customs Court·Decided December 8, 1958·No. No. 62550; protest 324695-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

[435]*435Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles covered by item 3132 (“Gent's Bracelets all brass chrome plated”) are articles of jewelry known as identification bracelets, the claim at 55 percent under paragraph 1527 (a) (2), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), was sustained. Item 723PB ("Polished brass Plaque”) and item 723PO (“Chrome plated Brass Plaque”), stipulated to consist of parts of jewelry, valued under 20 cents per dozen pieces, were held dutiable at 22)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified, supra, for metal articles, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 434 (cusc 1958).

41 Cust. Ct. 434 (Everbest Jewelry Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.