Everard v. Brennan

City of New York Municipal Court

Everard v. Brennan

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 351

DecidedApril 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 351 (Everard v. Brennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everard v. Brennan, 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 351 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

McAdam, Ch. J.

The court is powerless to enforce obedience to its order, which proves that it should never have been made. The issuing of such orders tends to bring the courts into contempt, hence the practice is unwarranted. The only method of enforcing obedience is by attachment, and a member of the assembly cannot be arrested on civil process during his attendance at the session of the house to which he belongs (1 R. S. 6 ed. 504, § 6), also while going to or returning from such session Id., § 7). The privilege extends after any adjournment of the legislature until its next meeting, when such adjournment shall not exceed fourteen days (Id., § 8).

The defendant committed no contempt of court in neglecting to obey its order. He owed a higher duty to the State, and its performance could not be enjoined or prevented either by direct or indirect methods. The exemption is founded on grounds of public policy, and is not allowed out of any personal consideration for the officer. The privileges of the members are of so great importance that no man is allowed to plead ignorance of the persons of those who are entitled to them (Cushing's Law of Leg. Assemblies, § 554).

Exemption from legal process is one of the most important privileges of members of a legislative assembly (Id., § 549). They are exempt from arrest on civil process (Id., 558). The privilege of exemption from legal process [353]*353being intended to enable the members to give their attendance at the time and place appointed for their sitting, and to remain together for the purpose of performing their duties as members ; it is manifest, that to be commensurate with the purpose for which it was intended, the privilege must commence a sufficient time previous to the session to enable the members to attend in season, and must continue all the time of the sitting of the assembly, and, for the same reason which prevails in other cases of privilege, it ought also to continue for such a time after the termination of the sitting, as to enable the members to return to their homes (Id. § 579).

The Legislature has fixed this time at fourteen days prior to the session, and fourteen days after its close (1 R. S. 6 ed. 504, § 7). The privilege of legislative bodies is as old as the common law and older than Magna Charta (Potter’s Dwarris Stat. 573).

Under these circumstances, the order was improvidently issued, and must be vacated, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdam, Ch. J.

The court is powerless to enforce obedience to its order, which proves that it should never have been made. The issuing of such orders tends to bring the courts into contempt, hence the practice is unwarranted. The only method of enforcing obedience is by attachment, and a member of the assembly cannot be arrested on civil process during his attendance at the session of the house to which he belongs (1 R. S. 6 ed. 504, § 6), also while going to or returning from such session Id., § 7). The privilege extends after any adjournment of the legislature until its next meeting, when such adjournment shall not exceed fourteen days (Id., § 8).

The defendant committed no contempt of court in neglecting to obey its order. He owed a higher duty to the State, and its performance could not be enjoined or prevented either by direct or indirect methods. The exemption is founded on grounds of public policy, and is not allowed out of any personal consideration for the officer. The privileges of the members are of so great importance that no man is allowed to plead ignorance of the persons of those who are entitled to them (Cushing's Law of Leg. Assemblies, § 554).

Exemption from legal process is one of the most important privileges of members of a legislative assembly (Id., § 549). They are exempt from arrest on civil process (Id., 558). The privilege of exemption from legal process [353]*353being intended to enable the members to give their attendance at the time and place appointed for their sitting, and to remain together for the purpose of performing their duties as members ; it is manifest, that to be commensurate with the purpose for which it was intended, the privilege must commence a sufficient time previous to the session to enable the members to attend in season, and must continue all the time of the sitting of the assembly, and, for the same reason which prevails in other cases of privilege, it ought also to continue for such a time after the termination of the sitting, as to enable the members to return to their homes (Id. § 579).

The Legislature has fixed this time at fourteen days prior to the session, and fourteen days after its close (1 R. S. 6 ed. 504, § 7). The privilege of legislative bodies is as old as the common law and older than Magna Charta (Potter’s Dwarris Stat. 573).

Under these circumstances, the order was improvidently issued, and must be vacated, but without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everard-v-brennan-nynyccityct-1887.