Evelyn Rogers v. Rosa Rogers

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 27, 2017
DocketA17A1436
StatusPublished

This text of Evelyn Rogers v. Rosa Rogers (Evelyn Rogers v. Rosa Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evelyn Rogers v. Rosa Rogers, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 21, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1436. EVELYN ROGERS v. ROSA ROGERS.

After the trial court issued a family violence protective order against Evelyn Rogers, she filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. In Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), the Supreme Court determined that actions arising under the Family Violence Act, OCGA § 19-13-1 et seq., constitute domestic relations cases within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). Accordingly, appeals in family violence actions must be made by application for discretionary appeal. See Schmidt, supra. Because Rogers failed to follow the proper appellate procedure, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/21/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Evelyn Rogers v. Rosa Rogers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evelyn-rogers-v-rosa-rogers-gactapp-2017.