Evelyn Hollman, Etc. v. Max v. Cogen and Peter M. Cogen, D/B/A 187 Street Apartments, Ltd.
478 F.2d 702, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9330
Opinion
ORDER:
Appellee’s answer to a motion for reconsideration filed with the District Court below stated that appellant had since paid her rent and her tenancy was then in good standing. Appellee stated *703 that it had not brought an action against appellant nor does it intend to do so. The case is therefore moot and the order of the District Court is vacated with directions to dismiss the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evelyn Hollman, Etc. v. Max v. Cogen and Peter M. Cogen, D/B/A 187 Street Apartments, Ltd., 478 F.2d 702, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9330 (5th Cir. 1973).
478 F.2d 702 (Evelyn Hollman, Etc. v. Max v. Cogen and Peter M. Cogen, D/B/A 187 Street Apartments, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)
Brennan v. Mauldin
478 F.2d 702 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)