Evelyn Hollman, Etc. v. Max v. Cogen and Peter M. Cogen, D/B/A 187 Street Apartments, Ltd.
This text of 478 F.2d 702 (Evelyn Hollman, Etc. v. Max v. Cogen and Peter M. Cogen, D/B/A 187 Street Apartments, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER:
Appellee’s answer to a motion for reconsideration filed with the District Court below stated that appellant had since paid her rent and her tenancy was then in good standing. Appellee stated *703 that it had not brought an action against appellant nor does it intend to do so. The case is therefore moot and the order of the District Court is vacated with directions to dismiss the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F.2d 702, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evelyn-hollman-etc-v-max-v-cogen-and-peter-m-cogen-dba-187-street-ca5-1973.