Evelio Soriano v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Evelio Soriano v. United States

441 F.2d 260, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10386

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 1971

Docket30830

StatusPublished

This text of 441 F.2d 260 (Evelio Soriano v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evelio Soriano v. United States, 441 F.2d 260, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10386 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 F.2d 260, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evelio-soriano-v-united-states-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack