Evarts v. Dunton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Evarts v. Dunton

1 Brayt. 70

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1817·No. No. 7·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court,

1. The defendants. ought to have Been permitted to shew, that the Select men hadplqcqd.a sp^lgr.on the lot in question, and that the same was voted to the ministerial right, according to the provisions of the Statute. 2 vol. p. 316.

2. The Judge ought to have charged the Jury, that the plaintiff could recover against those defendants only who were proved to be in possession.

See Mortgage 4. Judgment 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court,

1. The defendants. ought to have Been permitted to shew, that the Select men hadplqcqd.a sp^lgr.on the lot in question, and that the same was voted to the ministerial right, according to the provisions of the Statute. 2 vol. p. 316.

2. The Judge ought to have charged the Jury, that the plaintiff could recover against those defendants only who were proved to be in possession.

See Mortgage 4. Judgment 2.

Evarts v. Dunton, 1 Brayt. 70 (Vt. 1817).

Pincite

1 Brayt. 70 (Evarts v. Dunton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.