Evart v. Shapiro, Beilly & Aronowitz, LLP

127 A.D.3d 409, 4 N.Y.S.3d 502
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 2015·No. 14698 307387/12·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about July 2, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly dismissed plaintiffs legal malpractice claims, since this Court previously dismissed the informed consent claims in the underlying action for lack of causation (Evart v Park Ave. Chiropractic, P.C., 86 AD3d 442 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 922 [2011]). Accordingly, plaintiff cannot establish that she would have succeeded on the merits of her underlying informed consent claims “but for” defendants’ negligence (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evart v. Shapiro, Beilly & Aronowitz, LLP, 127 A.D.3d 409, 4 N.Y.S.3d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

127 A.D.3d 409 (Evart v. Shapiro, Beilly & Aronowitz, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & Wardwell
866 N.E.2d 1033 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
Evart v. Park Avenue Chiropractic, P.C.
86 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)