Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. Posey

12 Ind. 363
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 Ind. 363 (Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. Posey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. Posey, 12 Ind. 363 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit by the company on an absolute and unconditional subscription, by the defendant, to the capital stock of the company.

Judgment for the defendant.

The defense set up was, in substance, that the subscription was obtained by the fraud of the company, through her agents, in representing and promising the defendant that the road would be located through, or, at most, within a half a mile of the town of Petersburgh, whereas it has been located and constructed two miles from said town.

That such defense cannot prevail, has heretofore been [364]*364decided by this Court. The New Albany and Salem Railroad Co. v. Fields, 10 Ind. R. 187.

O. TI. Smith, for the appellants. L. Q. De Bruler, for the appellee.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ollesheimer v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.
44 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Montgomery Southern Railway Co. v. Matthews
77 Ala. 357 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ind. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evansville-indianapolis-cleveland-straight-line-railroad-v-posey-ind-1859.