Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. Posey

12 Ind. 363
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1859·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit by the company on an absolute and unconditional subscription, by the defendant, to the capital stock of the company.

Judgment for the defendant.

The defense set up was, in substance, that the subscription was obtained by the fraud of the company, through her agents, in representing and promising the defendant that the road would be located through, or, at most, within a half a mile of the town of Petersburgh, whereas it has been located and constructed two miles from said town.

That such defense cannot prevail, has heretofore been [364]*364decided by this Court. The New Albany and Salem Railroad Co. v. Fields, 10 Ind. R. 187.

O. TI. Smith, for the appellants. L. Q. De Bruler, for the appellee.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. Posey, 12 Ind. 363 (Ind. 1859).

12 Ind. 363 (Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. Posey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ollesheimer v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.
44 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Montgomery Southern Railway Co. v. Matthews
77 Ala. 357 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)