Evans-Wallower Lead Co. v. Byrd

1935 OK 1121, 51 P.2d 497, 174 Okla. 626, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1334
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 19, 1935
DocketNo. 26451.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1935 OK 1121 (Evans-Wallower Lead Co. v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans-Wallower Lead Co. v. Byrd, 1935 OK 1121, 51 P.2d 497, 174 Okla. 626, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1334 (Okla. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original action in this court by the petitioner Evans-Wallower Lead Company, seeking the review and vacation of an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent George Byrd.

Respondent filed a claim with the State Industrial Commission on September 24, 1934, seeking compensation for an alleged accidental injury occurring on November 16, 1933. The petitioner filed an answer denying liability and alleging failure of the respondent to give notice as required by statute and a lack of actual notice or any notice whatsoever for more than ten months after the occurrence of the alleged injury and prejudice resulting to the petitioner by reason thereof.

The question of notice or sufficiency of 'excuse for failure to give such notice was thus put in issue, but the Commission failed to make any finding thereon. It was the mandatory duty of the Commission to make a finding upon this issue based upon competent evidence before it, either excusing such failure should the evidence warrant such action or else denying the claim for lack of jurisdiction; the burden of proof upon the (issue being upon the claimant. Under the authority of Greer County Gins v. Dunnington, 166 Okla. 302, 27 P. (2d) 630; Dover Oil Co. v. Bellmyer, 163 Okla. 51, 20 P. (2d) 556; Magnolia Petroleum Corp. v. Walls, 158 Okla. 199, 13 P. (2d) 147; Skelly Oil Co. v. Johnson, 157 Okla. 278, 12 P. (2d) 177; Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Banks, 155 Okla. 152, 8 P. (2d) 17; Pioneer Gas Utilities Co. v. Howard, 154 Okla. 239, 7 P. (2d) 435, the award is vacated and the cause remanded to the Industrial Commission for such further proceedings as the facts may warrant.

Award vacated and cause remanded.

McNEILL, C. J., and BAYLESS, WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skelly Oil Co. v. Grimm
1944 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1944)
Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. Robinson
1938 OK 40 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Grant & Engle Tubing Co. v. Coppin
1936 OK 809 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1935 OK 1121, 51 P.2d 497, 174 Okla. 626, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-wallower-lead-co-v-byrd-okla-1935.