Evans v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 3, 2020·No. 2:17-cv-01123·Unknown

Opinion

ROBERT S. ADDISON, JR. (SBN 188565) C. DANA HOBART (SBN 125139) MANCY PENDERGRASS (SBN 252705) BUCHALTER, A Professional Corporation 1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 Telephone: (213)-891-0700 Facsimile: (213)-896-0400 Email: raddison@buchalter.com dhobart@buchalter.com mpendergrass@buchalter.com

ROBERT S. MCWHORTER (SBN 226186) JARRETT S. OSBORNE-REVIS (SBN 289193) BUCHALTER, A Professional Corporation 500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1900 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 Telephone: (213)-891-0700 Facsimile: (916)-945-5170 Email: rmchworter@buchalter.com josbornerevis@buchalter.com Attorneys for Defendant, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A., a national banking association, formerly known as ZB, N.A., doing business as California Bank & Trust EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION RONALD C. EVANS, an individual; JOAN M. No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB EVANS, an individual; DENNIS TREADAWAY, an individual; and all others similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. ZB, N.A., a national banking association, dba California Bank & Trust, Defendant. ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A., a national banking association, formerly known as ZB, N.A., doing business as California Bank & Trust, Third-Party Plaintiff vs. JTS COMMUNITIES, INC., a California Corporation; LARRY A. CARTER, an individual; JACK T. SWEIGART, an individual; and BRISTOL INSURANCE COMPANY, a dissolved Utah corporation; and ROES 1-20 inclusive, Third-Party Defendants. Plaintiffs Ronald C. Evans, Joan M. Evans, and Dennis Treadaway, (the “Putative Class Action Representatives”), Defendant, Zions Bancorporation, N.A., a national banking association, formerly known as ZB, N.A., doing business as California Bank & Trust (“CB&T”), and Third Party Defendants JTS Communities, Inc., Larry A. Carter, Jack T. Sweigart, and Bristol Insurance Company (collectively, “Third Party Defendants,” and together with the Putative Class Action Representatives and CB&T, the “Parties”) in good faith believe that certain documents in this matter contain information that is confidential, or potentially invasive of individual and/or corporate privacy interests. For these reasons, the Parties hereby agree that documents subject to this Stipulated Protective Order shall be designated as “Confidential.” 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting the litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that the Designating Party believes in good faith is entitled to protection under contract, applicable California or Federal law, or because of professional responsibility to a client. CONFIDENTIAL information or items include, but are not limited to, trade secrets or other confidential research, development, or commercial information, or confidential financial information of a Party or third party such as account records, account numbers, or social security numbers. 2.2 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.3 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.4 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.5 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its attorneys to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.6 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that the Designating Party believes in good faith contains extremely sensitive CONFIDENTIAL information or items whose disclosure to another Party or Non-party would create a substantial risk of serious injury or violation of law that could not be avoided by less restrictive means such that disclosure should be limited to the persons in Section 6.2(a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (k), (l), and (m). 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Objecting Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, as well as their employees and support staffs. 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, and consultants. 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” pursuant to this Protective Order. 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material, but also (1) any information copied from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts and summaries of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Stipulated Protective Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Stipulated Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. “Final disposition” shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein af

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Evans v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (Evans v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)