Evans v. Woodard
This text of 90 S.E. 955 (Evans v. Woodard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in an equitable petition gave bond with surety upon condition to obtain an injunction. The plaintiff failed in his suit, and the defendant obtained a judgment against him and the surety on his bond. This judgment was reviewed by the Supreme Court and held to be valid and binding upon both principal and surety. Harris v. Woodard, 144 Ga. 211 (86 S. E. 1097). Subsequently the surety filed an equitable petition to set aside the judgment, on the ground that the attorney for the defendant in the former suit had granted certain indulgences to his principal, of which he did not know prior to the filing of this suit. The matters complained of were all known to the principal at the time the judgment was rendered against him - and his surety, and could have been ascertained by the surety with [85]*85the slightest exercise of diligence. The court did not abuse his discretion in refusing to enjoin the fi. fa. against the surety.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 S.E. 955, 146 Ga. 84, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-woodard-ga-1916.