Evans v. Winona, Lumber Co.

16 N.W. 404, 30 Minn. 515, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 22, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 16 N.W. 404 (Evans v. Winona, Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Winona, Lumber Co., 16 N.W. 404, 30 Minn. 515, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 209 (Mich. 1883).

Opinion

Bebey, J.

On May 1, 1881, plaintiff orally leased certain preña-ses to defendant, at an annual rent of $300, for a term of three [516]*516years, beginning on that day, reserving the right to terminate the lease at any time, upon four months’ notice. Defendant, having gone into possession under the lease, continued therein for one year from the commencement of the term.

Upon this state of facts plaintiff is entitled to recover the annual rent fixed by the oral lease, namely, the sum of $300. The lease is for three years, subject to the lessor’s right of termination; that is .to say, it is liable to be defeated by something in the nature of a condition subsequent, to wit, an affirmative act on the part of the lessor. Until this act is done, it is in form a lease for three years, and therefore void under Gen. St. 1878, c. 41, § 10, as being for a term “exceeding one year.” But though void as a lease, the rule is that if the lessee goes into possession under it, it regulates the terms of the tenancy as respects rent. Laughran v. Smith, 75 N. Y. 205; Thurber v. Dwyer, 10 R. I. 355; Larkins v. Avery, 23 Conn. 304; Morrill v. Mackman, 24 Mich. 279; Taylor’s Landlord & Tenant, § 80; Wood on Landlord & Tenant, § 25.

This rule may not be logical — very likely it is not, as an origina proposition; but that it is the rule established by the authorities there can be no doubt. We have not had our attention called to an^ authority to the contrary, nor have we discovered any.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borchardt v. Kulick
48 N.W.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)
Quayle v. Stone
251 P. 630 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1926)
Oxborough v. St. Martin
210 N.W. 854 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Fisher v. Heller
207 N.W. 498 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Cole v. Bunch
1921 OK 196 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Halloran v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co.
162 N.W. 1082 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)
Leadbetter v. Pewtherer
121 P. 799 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1912)
Dobbs v. Atlas Elevator Co.
126 N.W. 250 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
Watkins v. Balch
83 P. 321 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Denison v. Sawyer
104 N.W. 305 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Goodwin v. Clover
98 N.W. 322 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1904)
Spinney v. Hill
84 N.W. 116 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
Peoples v. Evens
77 N.W. 93 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1898)
Steele v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n
58 N.W. 685 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1894)
Johnson v. Albertson
53 N.W. 642 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)
Cochran v. Ward
29 N.E. 795 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.W. 404, 30 Minn. 515, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-winona-lumber-co-minn-1883.