Evans v. Wagenseil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Evans v. Wagenseil

258 A.D. 740, 15 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 740 (Evans v. Wagenseil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Wagenseil, 258 A.D. 740, 15 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Defendant appeals (a) from an order denying his motion for a modification of plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars by striking out specified items, and (b) from so much of an order as directed defendant to submit to an examination before trial on certain specified matters or items. The order relating to plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars is modified by striking out the first and second ordering paragraphs and in place thereof substituting the following: “ Ordered that defendant’s motion be and the same hereby is denied as to Item 2, except that defendant may state the approximate time if he lacks knowledge of the exact time referred to in that item. Ordered that defendant’s motion be and the same hereby is granted as to Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11, which are hereby struck from the demand.” As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs, the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. The order relating to defendant’s examination before trial, in so far as appealed from, is modified by striking out Items 7, 10 and 12, and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Defendant appeals (a) from an order denying his motion for a modification of plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars by striking out specified items, and (b) from so much of an order as directed defendant to submit to an examination before trial on certain specified matters or items. The order relating to plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars is modified by striking out the first and second ordering paragraphs and in place thereof substituting the following: “ Ordered that defendant’s motion be and the same hereby is denied as to Item 2, except that defendant may state the approximate time if he lacks knowledge of the exact time referred to in that item. Ordered that defendant’s motion be and the same hereby is granted as to Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11, which are hereby struck from the demand.” As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs, the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. The order relating to defendant’s examination before trial, in so far as appealed from, is modified by striking out Items 7, 10 and 12, and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 740, 15 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-wagenseil-nyappdiv-1939.