Evans v. Urbina
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT ~ 1 2009 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts Juan F. Evans, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09 1992 ) ) Ricardo M. Urbina, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and
application for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is
required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, seeks
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)
(2)(B)(iii).
Plaintiff, a resident of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, sues United States District Judge
Ricardo M. Urbina in his official and individual capacity for dismissing his complaint against the
Clerk ofthe Supreme Court and two assistant clerks. CompI.,-r,-r 4-6. Judges are absolutely
immune from lawsuits predicated on acts taken, as alleged here, in their judicial capacity.
Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219, 225 (1988); Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349,355-57 (1978);
Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993). The complaint therefore will be
dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
~~. Date: October ~, 2009 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evans v. Urbina (Evans v. Urbina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.