Evans v. State
This text of 135 S.W.2d 121 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is forgery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
There is a fatal variance between the purport and tenor clauses of the indictment. In the purport clause it is alleged that appellant made a false instrument in writing purporting to be the act of J. E. Masters, Sr. The alleged forged instrument, as set out in the indictment, is signed “Edd Masters.” The indictment embraces no innuendo averments explaining the connection between J. E. Masters, Sr., and Edd Masters. See Simms v. State, 32 S. W. (2d) 852. The State’s Attorney before this Court confesses error.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.W.2d 121, 138 Tex. Crim. 179, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-texcrimapp-1940.