Evans v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Evans v. State

1937 OK CR 163, 72 P.2d 845, 63 Okla. Crim. 79, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 22, 1937

DocketNo. A-9313.

StatusPublished

This text of 1937 OK CR 163 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. State, 1937 OK CR 163, 72 P.2d 845, 63 Okla. Crim. 79, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155 (Okla. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, and sentenced to serve a term of one year in the state penitentiary, and appeals.

The record in this case was filed in this court on April 19, 1987. The case was submitted on the record on September 28, 1987, since which time counsel for plaintiff in error has advised the court they did not desire to file a brief. It is therefore assumed that the appeal has been abandoned, or that counsel representing the plaintiff in error has reached the conclusion there are no errors in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal.

The record has been carefully examined, and the examination fails to disclose any fundamental errors. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, and sentenced to serve a term of one year in the state penitentiary, and appeals.

The record in this case was filed in this court on April 19, 1987. The case was submitted on the record on September 28, 1987, since which time counsel for plaintiff in error has advised the court they did not desire to file a brief. It is therefore assumed that the appeal has been abandoned, or that counsel representing the plaintiff in error has reached the conclusion there are no errors in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal.

The record has been carefully examined, and the examination fails to disclose any fundamental errors. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1937 OK CR 163, 72 P.2d 845, 63 Okla. Crim. 79, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-oklacrimapp-1937.