Evans v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Evans v. State

415 S.W.3d 177, 2013 WL 6498965, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 2013·No. No. WD 75478·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Mohammed Evans appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Jackson County following an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Mohammed Evans appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Jackson County following an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Evans v. State, 415 S.W.3d 177, 2013 WL 6498965, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

415 S.W.3d 177 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.