Evans v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Evans v. State

210 S.W.3d 451, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2007 WL 3328

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 2, 2007

DocketNo. ED 87488

StatusPublished

This text of 210 S.W.3d 451 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. State, 210 S.W.3d 451, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2007 WL 3328 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Christopher Evans (“Mov-ant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted following a plea of guilty to one count of sale of a controlled substance (“Count I”), section 195.211, RSMo 2000,¹ and one count of possession of a controlled substance (“Count II”), section 195.202. Movant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections for Count I and one year in a medium security institute for Count II, with the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Christopher Evans (“Mov-ant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted following a plea of guilty to one count of sale of a controlled substance (“Count I”), section 195.211, RSMo 2000,¹ and one count of possession of a controlled substance (“Count II”), section 195.202. Movant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections for Count I and one year in a medium security institute for Count II, with the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 S.W.3d 451, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2007 WL 3328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-moctapp-2007.