Evans v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Evans v. State

70 Ga. App. 497

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1944

Docket30219

StatusPublished

This text of 70 Ga. App. 497 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. State, 70 Ga. App. 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The contention of the defendant .that venue was not proved is not meritorious as the answer of the trial judge to the writ of certiorari, which is controlling in the matter, expressly states that a named witness testified that the criminal act charged was committed in Eulton County, as alleged in the accusation.

The evidence authorized the verdict and a new trial was properly refused.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur. C. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. Bindley W. Gamp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The contention of the defendant .that venue was not proved is not meritorious as the answer of the trial judge to the writ of certiorari, which is controlling in the matter, expressly states that a named witness testified that the criminal act charged was committed in Eulton County, as alleged in the accusation.

The evidence authorized the verdict and a new trial was properly refused.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., concur. C. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. Bindley W. Gamp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 Ga. App. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-gactapp-1944.