Evans v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Evans v. State

20 S.E.2d 91, 67 Ga. App. 300, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 390

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 25, 1942

Docket29419.

StatusPublished

This text of 20 S.E.2d 91 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. State, 20 S.E.2d 91, 67 Ga. App. 300, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Brovles, O. J.

The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery known as the “number game,” for the hazarding of money. His certiorari was overruled. Under the facts set forth in the stipulation agreed to in open court by counsel for both parties, and the evidence introduced on the trial, the judge, trying the case without the intervention of a jury, was authorized to adjudge the defendant guilty. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brovles, O. J.

The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery known as the “number game,” for the hazarding of money. His certiorari was overruled. Under the facts set forth in the stipulation agreed to in open court by counsel for both parties, and the evidence introduced on the trial, the judge, trying the case without the intervention of a jury, was authorized to adjudge the defendant guilty. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.E.2d 91, 67 Ga. App. 300, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-gactapp-1942.