Evans v. State
41 S.E. 691, 115 Ga. 229, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 362
Opinion
1. Where in the trial of a criminal case improper remarks are made by counsel for the State, which, however, refer to a matter not material to the issue, and the judge cautions the jury not to consider such remarks, it is not error to refuse to grant a mistrial.
2. Where a case is submitted on briefs, assignments of error not referred to in the brief of the plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned.
3. The evidence warranted the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evans v. State, 41 S.E. 691, 115 Ga. 229, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 362 (Ga. 1902).
41 S.E. 691 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grayhouse v. State
16 S.E.2d 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)