Evans v. State

78 Ga. 351
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 7, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 78 Ga. 351 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. State, 78 Ga. 351 (Ga. 1886).

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

[Bartow Evans and John K. Simmons were indicted for the larceny of a still, worm and cap. On the trial, the corpus delicti was proved. Sam. Simmons, a witness for the State, testified that the defendants and himself stole the property, hid it for a time and then carried it to a place described by him, and set up and operated a still for sometime until the United States deputy marshals broke it up; and that he turned State’s evidence to prevent being prosecuted himself. As corroborative of this, it was shown that the owner recovered the stolen cap and worm from the deputy marshals. One witness testified that when one of the owners was looking for the property, the two defend[352]*352ants and Sam. Simmons came to his house; that the Simmonses wanted him to settle the matter and prevent a prosecution; and that Evans did not take part in the conversation. Another testified that after the still was broken up, he was sent by one Turns to John Simmons and Evans to purchase their tubs from them; that Simmons was sick and Evans went with witness to the place where the distillery was, said he owned part of the tubs and made arrangements about their sale.

The evidence for the defendants tended to show that Sam. Simmons alone committed the larceny, set up the still, ran it awhile and then sold it to John K. Simmons; and that Evans had nothing to do with it, but certain tubstaves were borrowed from him and John Simmons and used at the still.

The jury found the defendants guilty. They moved for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law, evidence and the charge of the court, and on a ground as to refusal to allow time to consult with a witness. The motion was overruled, and defendants excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sparks v. State
335 S.E.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
McConnell v. State
304 S.E.2d 733 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Cole v. State
274 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Garvin v. State
240 S.E.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Walker v. State
237 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Smith v. State
235 S.E.2d 17 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Jones v. State
229 S.E.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Birt v. State
225 S.E.2d 248 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Brown v. State
209 S.E.2d 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Nooner v. State
206 S.E.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
McPherson v. State
101 S.E.2d 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Gibson v. State
65 S.E.2d 818 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Mitchell v. State
42 S.E.2d 767 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Hillock v. State
39 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Wells v. State
20 S.E.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Kilgore v. State
20 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Lanier v. State
1 S.E.2d 405 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Hargett v. State
189 S.E. 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Bradshaw v. State
163 S.E. 295 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Sheppard v. State
162 S.E. 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Ga. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-ga-1886.