Evans v. State

49 So. 3d 1286, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19839, 2010 WL 5344110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Evans v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 985 So. 2d 1105
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 2010·No. No. 4D09-75·Published

Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has filed a motion for rehearing. He argues this court may have [1287]*1287overlooked two remaining issues raised in his initial brief concerning the motion for judgment of acquittal and the defendant’s enhanced sentence. This court has considered those issues and finds them moot in light of our reversal and remand for a new trial where those issues can be addressed first by the trial court. We therefore deny the motion for rehearing.

FARMER, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. State, 49 So. 3d 1286, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19839, 2010 WL 5344110 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

49 So. 3d 1286 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.