Evans v. State

880 So. 2d 787, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10467, 2004 WL 1562188
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 2004·No. No. 1D03-2155·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm both issues on appeal. As to the first issue, the jury instructions given in the instant case distinguish it from the case relied on by Appellant, State v. Estevez, 753 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999). As to the second issue, this argument has previously been rejected by this Court. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. State, 880 So. 2d 787, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10467, 2004 WL 1562188 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

880 So. 2d 787 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yocom v. Wuesthoff Health Systems, Inc.
880 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)