Evans v. State
This text of 427 So. 2d 308 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s denial of Evans’ claim for relief under Rule 3.850 is affirmed. Evans’ claim that he was entitled to be man-datorily classified and sentenced as a youthful offender under the then applicable provision of Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), see Stancil v. State, 405 So.2d 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), is patently without merit in that a person, as Evans, simultaneously convicted of more than one felony is not entitled to mandatory classification, State v. Goodson, 403 So.2d 1337 (Fla.1981), under either of the felonies, Abram v. State, 408 So.2d 215 (Fla.1981), notwithstanding that the convictions arise from a single criminal episode. Barnhill v. State, 406 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1981); Flores v. State, 406 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 So. 2d 308, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.