Evans v. State

267 So. 2d 87

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Evans v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5653 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1972·No. No. 71-29·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried, non-jury, and found guilty of robbery and assault with intent to commit murder.

Reversal is sought on the ground that the court erred in admitting the in-court identification of the defendant by one of the victims.

After careful consideration of the record and briefs we have concluded that the point is without merit and that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried, non-jury, and found guilty of robbery and assault with intent to commit murder.

Reversal is sought on the ground that the court erred in admitting the in-court identification of the defendant by one of the victims.

After careful consideration of the record and briefs we have concluded that the point is without merit and that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.

Evans v. State, 267 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

267 So. 2d 87 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.