Evans v. State

119 So. 595, 22 Ala. App. 651, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 289
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 1928
Docket3 Div. 591.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 So. 595 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. State, 119 So. 595, 22 Ala. App. 651, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 289 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As so many times held by both the Supreme Court and this court, that citation of authority is deemed unnecessary, the indorsement “a true bill,” signed by the foreman of the'grand jury, is the life of the indictment. And where the record, on appeal, fails to show this indorsement on the indictment under which appellant was put on trial, the conviction cannot stand.

The record In this case reveals the omission of the aforementioned vital indorsement, and the judgment- is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. State
147 So. 649 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 So. 595, 22 Ala. App. 651, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-alactapp-1928.