Evans v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Evans v. State

485 So. 2d 402

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 12, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 485 So. 2d 402 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. State, 485 So. 2d 402 (Ala. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from the summary denial of a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appellant contends that he was denied due process at his prison disciplinary hearing for possession of contraband.

The disciplinary hearing board found the appellant "`guilty' due to the arresting officer's statement presented in court, that Inmate Evans did have 19 handrolled cigarettes in his right hand and 16 handrolled cigarettes in his right shirt pocket containing *Page 403 a substance believed to be marijuana." This finding fails to satisfy the procedural requirements of Barker v. State,437 So.2d 1375 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983). Without information as to why the arresting officer believed the material to be marijuana, the action of the disciplinary board was arbitrary and capricious. Barker, 437 So.2d at 1377. The arresting officer's report also shows that the defendant had in his possession "19 yellow in color pills scored on one side with M.S.D. over 942, other side Clinoril." However, the finding of guilty was not based on that evidence.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded with instructions that the circuit court remand this cause to the prison disciplinary board for that board to grant the petitioner a new hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from the summary denial of a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appellant contends that he was denied due process at his prison disciplinary hearing for possession of contraband.

The disciplinary hearing board found the appellant "`guilty' due to the arresting officer's statement presented in court, that Inmate Evans did have 19 handrolled cigarettes in his right hand and 16 handrolled cigarettes in his right shirt pocket containing *Page 403 a substance believed to be marijuana." This finding fails to satisfy the procedural requirements of Barker v. State,437 So.2d 1375 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983). Without information as to why the arresting officer believed the material to be marijuana, the action of the disciplinary board was arbitrary and capricious. Barker, 437 So.2d at 1377. The arresting officer's report also shows that the defendant had in his possession "19 yellow in color pills scored on one side with M.S.D. over 942, other side Clinoril." However, the finding of guilty was not based on that evidence.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded with instructions that the circuit court remand this cause to the prison disciplinary board for that board to grant the petitioner a new hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 So. 2d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-alacrimapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack